|
              
|
 |
July 6, 2008 |
 |
Classification
of Technical Fouls
Traditionally
trainers and interpreters have taught officials to call a technical
foul like any other foul, they're all the same." "Call it
with dignity." "If you don't haw,what it takes to call the
technical foul, you shouldn't be here." "If you can't take
the heat * * *" I propose these statements are pure cannon fodder.
Technical fouls are different. Officials are in the people business,
always in the public eye, under so much scrutiny where the people only
remember the mistakes, where your reputation is on the line every time
out.
Personal fouls are tough enough, but technical fouls challenge a referee's
ability to exercise people skills and the ability to get along with
others. They have the potential to be confrontational, one on one between
official and coach. Coaches are suspicious of officials to begin with.
We say, "don't wake them up," don't give them the chance to
confirm their suspicions.
There is a reluctance to call technical fouls. The game is abruptly
halted, it takes more time to administer, rule knowledge and the power
to explain are heavily drawn upon. It's not call the foul, bird dog,
preliminary signal, report, and be gone. If it's not different, why
do assigners request a phone call immediately after the game to explain
the circumstances. It is different.
The reluctance also occurs because officials are not certain to whom
the technical foul should be charged. Why exacerbate an already volatile
situation by administering it wrongly. Is it a team technical foul,
a player technical foul, a bench technical foul an indirect or direct
coach technical foul, an administrative infraction; should it also be
charged to a player and the coach, must it be discovered and penalized
before the ball becomes alive, or must it be penalized while the rule
is being violated? Technical fouls are a lot to remember. It is enjoyable
and entertaining to hear war stories concerning technical fouls, but
"Call them like any other foul?" I think not.
Our goal is to give an approach on how to teach officials to address
the classification of technical fouls, and to diminish an official's
anxiety when it is necessary to call one.
Before addressing the actual classification of technical fouls, a few
general principles should be explained regarding the bonus and disqualification
as they relate to technical fouls.
- All team fouls, personal
and technical count toward reaching the bonus, but we administer the
bonus free throws on all common fouls, except player control fouls beginning
with the a team's seventh (7th) in each half
- All fouls on players and
substitutes, personal and technical, count toward disqualification.
- The second technical foul
on ;my player or bench personnel results in disqualification.
- The second direct
technical foul or a combination of two indirect and one direct technical
fouls on the head coach results in disqualification.
Classifying Team
Technical Fouls
Remember the acronym "CARDS FOR EVERY CONCEIVABLE HOLIDAY!"
- C- Change player's
number to a number in the scorebook.
- A- Adding a name
to the squad list.
- R- Roster submitted
(10 minutes before start of game).
- D- Duplicate numbers.
- S- Starters (10 minutes
before start of game).
CARDS are administrative infractions (team technicals). Only two technical
fouls for administrative infractions may be called per game. One at
10 minutes before the start of the game and one for the remainder of
the game. At 10 minutes the only administrative infraction technical
you can have is roster or starters not submitted.
- F- Five, more
than five players simultaneously.
- E- Excessive timeout.
- C- Consuming 1
minute and not ready to start either half.
- H- Huddles, preventing
the ball from being put promptly into play. Contacting the free throw
shooter.Not after timeout or intermission, where resuming of play procedure
applies.
Team technicals do
not count toward disqualification, only toward the bonus. Remember team
technical fouls do not deal with illegal shirts or illegal numbers, they
are player -technical fouls. Technical fouls by Substitutes
- Failure to report to scorer.
- Failure to be beckoned by
official (except between quarters).
TFs by substitutes must be discovered and penalized before the ball
becomes alive.
Classifying
Player Technicals
Remember the acronym "FRIENDS CLUB"
- F- Free throws,
goaltending, and basket interference during free throws, knowingly attempting
free throw not entitled to.
- R- Rings, grasping
ring or dunking during pregame, also charged indirectly to coach. Charge
to player only during game.
- I- Illegal jersey
or number.
- E- Excessively
swinging elbows.
- N- Numbers, changing
numbers without reporting to scorer or official.
- D- Disqualification,
participating after disqualification.
- S-Slow, delaying,
or preventing ball from being put promptly into play. Reaching through
plane and touching ball.
- C- Contact fouls,
dead ball, intentional or flagrant.
- L- Language, profane,
inappropriate.
- U- Un sportsmanlike
conduct, taunting and baiting.
- B- Backboard, striking or
slapping.
Classifying Bench Technicals
Remember the acronym FOILS
- F- Fan, inciting
negative crowd reaction.
- O- Opponents, disrespectfully
addressing or baiting opponents.
- I- Integrity, questioning
or influencing official.
- L- Language, inappropriate
or obscene gestures.
- S- Seated, remain
seated unless to spontaneously react to good play by own team.
Bench TFs are charged to the offender and to the head coach as an indirect
technical fold, unless the offender is the head coach.
Bench
Decorum Requirements
Coach may leave bench to-Remember the acronym "Calm Referees Stay
Trouble free In Delicate Situations"
- C- Correctable
error, confer at table to request timeout for correctable error.
- R- Replace, injured
or disqualified player within 30 seconds.
- S- Speak to players
during timeout.
- T- Timeout, instruct
player to request.
- I- Injured player,
attend to, when beckoned onto court.
- D- Disqualified
or injured player, replace or remove.
- S-Scoring and timing
mistakes, confer at table to request timeout.
Direct
Technical Fouls
Direct technical fouls are technical fouls charged to the head coach
as a result of the coach's own behavior or actions. They include:
- Coaching box infractions.
- Failure to replace
an injured or disqualified player within 30 seconds.
Disqualified individual on
the team bench causes further problems.
If two direct technical fouls are charged, the head coach is ejected.
Indirect Technical Fouls
Other technical fouls charged to players or bench personnel (pregame dunking,
hanging on ring, and a bench decorum) are charged indirectly to the head
coach with the head coach being ejected whenever the third technical foul
is charged. If coach is charged indirectly with a technical foul, it only
counts as one team foul to reach the bonus.
Technical Fouls
Resulting in Disqualification
- Flagrant technical
fouls.
- Participate after
disqualification.
- Number changed
without reporting same to scorer and official.
Technical Fouls Which Must
Be Penalized Before Ball Becomes Alive Following the Infraction
- Wearing an illegal
number or shirt.
- Entering court
without reporting to scorer or being be beckoned by official.
- Excessive timeout.
Technical Fouls Penalized Whenever Discovered-Have duplicate
numbers on squad members
and or players. This assumes no other administrative infraction
has preceded it.
Technical Fouls Penalized If Discovered While Being Violated
- More than five players participating
simultaneously.
- Participate after changing
number without reporting to scorer and official.
- Participate after
being disqualified.
In. surveying 50 officials
this past season and at summer camps, the majority did not know whether
administrative infractions were team technical fouls or player technical
fouls. I wonder how many of those technical fouls were called. With a
better understanding of technical fouls, the anxiety level of the official
will not be as acute. The official will be in a better position and mindset
to exercise self-control and deal with the action, rather than worrying
"Am I getting the application right." The official will be comfortable
and balanced, and be able to diffuse a problem, rather than contribute
to it. And just maybe have absolute control to ensure that the technical
fouls were administered at the correct basket.
|
|
 |